| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql backslash consistency |
| Date: | 2005-05-27 21:14:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200505271714.57862.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Friday 27 May 2005 15:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > > I see hardly any use case for showing only user-defined functions
> > > or types by default. I think consistency is not necessarily
> > > desirable here.
> >
> > See the archives for previous discussion and/or use cases.
>
> I didn't find any. Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses
> for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem
> acceptable.
ISTM it is more acceptable than you're willing to admit.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00009.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00102.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00199.php
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-27 21:25:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-27 20:35:58 | Re: psql backslash consistency |