Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change

From: "Tim Vadnais" <tvadnais(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change
Date: 2005-05-25 15:41:23
Message-ID: 20050525154129.52D115284B@svr1.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi All,

Can someone please address this aspect of Sebastian's email? I, too, am
interested in the response.

>> Why does Postgres perform an update on the table even
>> if no data changes?
>> Can I circumvent this behaviour of Postgres?

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Böck
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:06 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] Update on tables when the row doesn't change

Hi all,

Maybe it's a very silly question, but why does Postgres perform an update on
the table even if no data changes?

I recognized this recently doing a rewrite of my rules because they took to
long. I had many conditional rules I collapsed to one unconditional rule, so
that the views get constructed only once. If I split these updates to the
underlying tables, I get a lot of updates which don't perform any "real"
updates.

Can I circumvent this behaviour of Postgres only by defining lot of rules /
triggers on these underlying table are there some trickier ways?

Any help appreciated,

Sebastian

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-05-25 15:51:57 Re: triggers/functions across databases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-25 14:06:40 Re: postmaster fails to start