| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | James Croft <james(dot)croft(at)lumison(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL release schedule |
| Date: | 2005-05-25 03:25:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20050525032510.GA15626@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 19:31:28 -0300,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005, James Croft wrote:
>
> >Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >>I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it
> >>needs to take to come out, which could be anything, but will likely be
> >>no earlier than the end of the year.
> >>
> >>I believe there was talk about an 8.1 coming out to replace the caching
> >>algorithm, but I believe the change was implemented in 8.0.3 or
> >>something like that, so there's no need to push out an 8.1 release.
> >
> >Thanks Scott.
>
> Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a
Isn't that feature freeze? Typically there has been a month between
feature freeze and the first official beta.
> Sep/Oct release ... if you've been around long enough, you'll know how
> fluid our 'estimates' tend to be, but that is our current goal ...
With a July 1 feature freeze, Nov/Dec is a much better estimate of when
there might be an 8.1 release. Even that is on the optimistic side.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-25 03:41:40 | Re: PostgreSQL release schedule |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-25 03:22:51 | Re: getting lock information |