Re: Select performance vs. mssql

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: mark durrant <markd89(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql
Date: 2005-05-24 17:27:13
Message-ID: 20050524172713.GC8129@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:36:36 -0700,
mark durrant <markd89(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> --MSSQL's ability to hit the index only and not having
> to go to the table itself results in a _big_
> performance/efficiency gain. If someone who's in
> development wants to pass this along, it would be a
> nice addition to PostgreSQL sometime in the future.
> I'd suspect that as well as making one query faster,
> it would make everything else faster/more scalable as
> the server load is so much less.

This gets brought up a lot. The problem is that the index doesn't include
information about whether the current transaction can see the referenced
row. Putting this information in the index will add significant overhead
to every update and the opinion of the developers is that this would be
a net loss overall.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-24 17:37:48 Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres
Previous Message Amit V Shah 2005-05-24 17:22:08 Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres