From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to another. |
Date: | 2005-05-24 16:10:00 |
Message-ID: | 20050524161000.GE8743@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:03:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> But having said that, I don't have a problem with putting in a
> pg_operator entry for numeric_power. And if someone wants to improve
> the scale factor calculations therein, go for it.
Oh, and while at it, it would be nice to solve the modulo bug that still
lurks there:
alvherre=# select 12345678901234567890 % 123;
?column?
----------
-45
(1 fila)
alvherre=# select 12345678901234567890 % 123::numeric(4,1);
?column?
----------
78.0
(1 fila)
alvherre=# select 12345678901234567890 % 123::numeric(3,0);
?column?
----------
-45
(1 fila)
alvherre=# select version();
version
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.1devel on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-4)
(1 fila)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"I call it GNU/Linux. Except the GNU/ is silent." (Ben Reiter)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc Soleda | 2005-05-24 16:18:46 | pg_autovacuum WinXP service |
Previous Message | Sebastian Böck | 2005-05-24 16:05:03 | Re: Update on tables when the row doesn't change |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-05-24 16:15:15 | Re: plperl strict mode |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-24 15:53:45 | Re: plperl strict mode |