From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Deadlocks in 7.4.x ... |
Date: | 2005-05-24 00:40:36 |
Message-ID: | 20050523211527.G61528@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Client is running 7.4.6 right now (we're looking at moving to 7.4.8 when
we can get a suitable ops window for the upgrade), and is experiencing
semi-regular (10-16 times a day) deadlocks, with the following
information:
A little background:
1) We do not do explicit row or table locking.
2) We use serialized transactions quite often.
3) All deadlocks are fighting for the same relation: 4335271, which is
the tsearch2 fulltext index on the articles table:
articles_idxft1_idx.
4) I have a trigger on the articles table which is executed before
insert or update. It updates the fulltext index column if any
changes are made to the relevant article columns. This is the only
place where changes are made to the fulltext index column.
DETAIL: Process 8122 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 4335271 of database 17142; blocked by process 11846.
Process 11846 waits for ShareLock on transaction 2897133915; blocked by process 10042.
Process 10042 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 4335271 of database 17142; blocked by process 8122.
----------------------------------
DETAIL: Process 10042 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 4335271 of database 17142; blocked by process 11846.
Process 11846 waits for ShareLock on transaction 2897133915; blocked by process 10042.
I haven't had much experience (okay, I've yet to use it) with tsearch2,
but according to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/limitations.html, GiST does
have concurrency issues "The current implementation of GiST within
PostgreSQL has some major limitations: GiST access is not concurrent"
Could this be what we are experiencing?
This is a wee bit vague, but I'm not sure what direction(s) to look at for
Deadlocks themselves, so pointers/ideas would be much appreciated ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-24 00:43:55 | plpgsql trigger - does it auto-acquire a lock? |
Previous Message | John Hansen | 2005-05-23 23:29:01 | Re: [PATCHES] character type value is not padded with spaces |