| From: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Image storage questions |
| Date: | 2005-05-20 21:54:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200505201554.28441.pgsql@bluepolka.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Friday May 20 2005 10:20 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > I asked this on general, but got no answer on this
> > particular point, maybe someone here knows. Are blobs are
> > stored in the shared memory cache upon retrieval?
>
> pg_largeobject is treated exactly the same as any other table,
> if that's what you are asking.
Yes, that was my question. Are large object rows also vacuumed
just as the other tables/rows?
Thanks.
Ed
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-20 22:00:55 | Re: GCC 4.0 on Mac OS X |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-20 21:31:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Inherited constraints and search paths (was Re: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Garamond | 2005-05-21 00:54:56 | Re: Two-phase commit issues |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-20 21:33:46 | Re: patches for items from TODO list |