From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
Date: | 2005-05-17 18:31:45 |
Message-ID: | 200505171131.45161.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew,
> Last time it came up I thought the problem was that there was not a
> consensus on *which* bugtracker to use.
Or whether to use one. Roughly 1/3 bugzilla, 1/3 something else, and 1/3
don't want a bugtracker. And, among the people who didn't want bugzilla,
some were vehemently opposed to it. Bugtrackers discussed included GForge,
bugzilla, RT, Roundup, Jura (they offered a free license) and a few I don't
remember.
> Incidentally, I'm not advocating we use bugzilla (if anything I think
> I'd lean towards using RT), but this seems like a good opportunity to
> note that as of a week or two ago bugzilla's HEAD branch supports using
> PostgreSQL as its backing store, and this will be maintained.
One of the things which came out of the bugtracker discussion is that anything
we use must have the ability for developers to interact 100% by e-mail, as
some critical developers will not use a web interface.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-17 18:34:46 | Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-17 18:27:13 | Re: alternate regression dbs? |