Re: Exec statement logging

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> What was the point again?
>
> > Simon said that the EXECUTE is pretty useless for debugging unless we
> > show the prepare query. His patch shows the prepare query for
> > client-side prepare, but not for server side when using the
> > PREPARE/EXECUTE commands --- seems we should display it in both cases.
>
> So we need to make sure that prepared statements always capture the
> originating query string. I thought you'd done that by using
> debug_query_string ... which is a bit ugly but not horrid. Why do
> we need more mechanism than that?

The problem is we have to pass that string down to the completion of the
query for log_min_duration_statement printing.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073