From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgFoundry |
Date: | 2005-05-16 17:56:38 |
Message-ID: | 200505161056.38709.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew,
> down, if positioned right, but can help people to see where things are
> going, and where the gaps are. This could in a sense be as simple as
> prioritising the TODO list. Right now anybody who wants to contribute
> and looks at the list has no idea if the item is considered important or
> even if it is still thought to be desirable. There are many changes that
> can be rung on this theme - you would probably want to keep the "roadmap
> process" as light as possible for the cultural reasons you mention.
The substantial problem here is that nobody *wants* to create a roadmap type
document. If you can find a volunteer, it'd be worth discussing -- I can
see a way we can make a "roadmap" without being deceptive about how we get
features.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-16 18:07:51 | Re: pgFoundry |
Previous Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2005-05-16 17:47:53 | Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order |