From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-12 13:12:48 |
Message-ID: | 20050512131248.GA6998@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Not kill -9. Kill -9 is "safe" because it causes a complete restart of
> the postmaster (it's the same as a backend crash, really). Kill -INT is
> also safe, because it does a simlpe query cancel.
Hmm, would it be possible to use another signal for "cancel the current
query and enter a state where no queries are accepted"? That would mean
driving the backend to a known idle state, allowing further action to
end the connection. From the client perspective, the connection is no
longer useful anyway, so he can only disconnect.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"In a specialized industrial society, it would be a disaster
to have kids running around loose." (Paul Graham)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-05-12 13:15:00 | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-12 12:57:06 | Re: SQL_ASCII vs. 7-bit ASCII encodings |