Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-11 20:04:16
Message-ID: 20050511200416.GH25637@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:44:21PM +0000, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> Yes yes I know, all of these can be done by a local administrator with
> console access and an editor and cmd line tools, but there are indeed
> people that do *not* have console access, or like to use decent tools....

Is there a reason they couldn't be bundled into a separate package,
and either put in contrib/ or (my preference) put on gforge or
whatever? The less-is-more approach in the default source seems to
me to be a good thing. I'm not convinced that packaged systems
should ship that way -- maybe these should be included in desktop
systems -- but enabled-by-default for many of these things seems to
me to be too dangerous.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-11 20:24:22 Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-11 20:00:37 Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres