Re: Two points about docs

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vladimir Chukharev <chu(at)kemia(dot)me(dot)tut(dot)fi>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two points about docs
Date: 2005-05-11 14:05:20
Message-ID: 200505111405.j4BE5KX13135@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > ! consistent between the various implementations. This chapter is also
> > ! not exhaustive; additional functions appear in relivant sections of
> > ! the manual.
>
> "relevant", please.

Yea, Neil got it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2005-05-11 19:23:00 create rule syntax
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2005-05-11 14:01:10 Re: Two points about docs