From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |
Date: | 2005-05-10 17:45:47 |
Message-ID: | 20050510174547.GH31103@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:01:54PM +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
> > Personally, I think the biggest win here would be adding package support
> > and syntax to plpgsql. Not only would it make porting from Oracle
> > easier, it would also make plpgsql much, much more powerful.
>
> Hello,
>
> What do you think about having some kind of language-independent
> packages ?
> I'm thinking that it could be handy to implement some functions in
> plpgsql, some functions in plpython and so . And then bundle them
> together into the same package.
Personally, I basically only use plpgsql, but I can certainly see where
there would be value in being able to include functions and procedures
from multiple languages in one package. But I suspect this will also
make some things more difficult, such as global static variables.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-10 17:55:00 | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-05-10 17:38:28 | Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments |