Re: Views, views, views! (long)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Views, views, views! (long)
Date: 2005-05-10 14:56:45
Message-ID: 200505101656.46153.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 12:20 schrieb Andreas Pflug:
> > and the information_schema is next to useless for these things since
> > it doesn't have PostgreSQL specific things in it.
>
> And the restriction to current user owned objects reduces usability to
> zero.

The information schema restricts the views to the objects to which you have
some access right, which doesn't seem all that useless.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Held 2005-05-10 15:08:23 Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-05-10 14:55:40 Re: Views, views, views! (long)