| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rmm(at)sqlisor(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |
| Date: | 2005-05-10 01:56:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200505100156.j4A1ure05167@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> B-
>
> > Just saying "we need Oracle packages" doesn't make it happen. ?I have
> > followed the discussion and I still don't have a clear idea of the exact
> > additions that people want, and without that, nothing is likely to
> > happen. ?I don't even have something for the TODO list at this point.
>
> That's what I'm trying to help define.
>
> I think that private variables and private functions need to be part of the
> definition.
OK, so it seems we need:
C static/private functions for schemas
C static/private variables for schemas
Are private variables implemented via the temporary per-session schema?
nested schemas
What does the standard say?
Is that it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-10 02:12:59 | Its all re-packaged ... |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-10 01:53:14 | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |