From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we get patents? |
Date: | 2005-05-08 06:17:59 |
Message-ID: | 20050508031725.V42300@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> I was reading LWN.net and noticed an article about Eben Moglen's keynote
> at linux.conf.au. Apparently he advises free software projects to get
> patents on their best ideas.
>
> Eben encouraged free software developers to record their novel
> inventions and to obtain patents on the best of them. Free legal
> help can be made available to obtain patents on the best ideas.
> Until the rules of the game can be changed, we must play the
> game, and having the right patents available may make all the
> difference in defending against an attack.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/133421/
>
> Eben Moglen is the FSF's attorney.
>
> I'm wondering, could the PostgreSQL Foundation (or some other entity)
> get patents on some parts of Postgres? Maybe ResourceOwners for
> example; or the newer parts of the optimizer.
>
> The patents would be freely licensed to everyone (including commercial
> redistributors and developers/users of competing products), except to
> patent litigators, or something like that.
Individual developers could get their work patent'd, I would imagine ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-05-08 07:18:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Invalid unicode in COPY problem |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-05-08 05:41:17 | Re: Patch for collation using ICU |