From: | Vortex <vortex25(at)gmx(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: select within aggregate? |
Date: | 2005-05-06 08:40:30 |
Message-ID: | 20050506104030.3e725437.vortex25@gmx.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Fri, 6 May 2005 13:34:26 +0530
"Ramakrishnan Muralidharan" <ramakrishnanm(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com> wrote:
> SELECT abc.remote_host , c , abc.request_uri , a.t FROM abc , ( select remote_host , count(*) as c , max( ts ) as t from abc group by remote_host ) as a
> where a.remote_host = abc.remote_host and abc.ts = a.t
I thought about this too. But what happens if there are accidentally two
sets with same timestamp in the table? I suppose the outer select would
match both of them. But a DISTINCT should help to avoid this.
Ok, if you think this is the propper way to meet the
requirement i will do so.
Thank you for your answer!
Klaus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenneth Gonsalves | 2005-05-06 09:14:29 | pg_dump without data |
Previous Message | Ramakrishnan Muralidharan | 2005-05-06 08:04:26 | Re: select within aggregate? |