| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
| Date: | 2005-05-06 06:40:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20050506064034.GJ88920@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:38:16PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > See Andrew's post. There is a whole lot of stuff not covered by I_S in a
> > way
> > that is useful to PGSQL users. Also this would require making
> > information_schema part of the default user path.
>
> It is supposed to be part of the default user path for all users of the database.
Huh? That seems like a really bad idea. Anything with names not starting
with pg_ really needs to not be in the search_path by default.
Speaking of which, any suggestions for names of internal-use objects?
Right now we've got some things named _pg_* to signify that they're
subject to change, but afaik the only naming convention PostgreSQL has
laid claim to is pg_*.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-06 06:45:02 | Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-06 06:31:08 | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |