From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-05 19:12:53 |
Message-ID: | 200505052112.55212.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > This is not to say that we might not want to adjust our
> > distribution setup so that it's easier for people to find 'em ---
> > that is, we could put JDBC/ODBC tarballs on the main ftp servers.
> > But I don't see the need for any coupling inside CVS.
>
> Hrmmm, that would be a bit more difficult,
No, it just needs someone with write access to the FTP server tree to
copy the files there once in a while, which is trivial to do. (All the
relevant people already have that access.)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 19:21:04 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 19:12:43 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-05-05 19:13:56 | Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 19:12:43 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |