Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-05 19:12:53
Message-ID: 200505052112.55212.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > This is not to say that we might not want to adjust our
> > distribution setup so that it's easier for people to find 'em ---
> > that is, we could put JDBC/ODBC tarballs on the main ftp servers.
> > But I don't see the need for any coupling inside CVS.
>
> Hrmmm, that would be a bit more difficult,

No, it just needs someone with write access to the FTP server tree to
copy the files there once in a while, which is trivial to do. (All the
relevant people already have that access.)

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 19:21:04 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 19:12:43 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-05-05 19:13:56 Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 19:12:43 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement