From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-05 19:58:55 |
Message-ID: | 200505051558.55390.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:25, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Can I suggest that we focus on PLs first and foremost, since that will
> >> allow us to get stuff like pl/PHP, pl/Java, pl/J(?), and pl/R in place,
> >> and then ramp up other stuff as time permits?
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> 'k, if there are no disagreements ...
A big reason I wanted plphp in the main souce was because I wanted it to be
part of the core package to help ease installation to be just one download
and one run at configure. I have marvel at the irony that not only is this
not going to happen, I will actually now have to download additional packages
for things I used to get in the core package.
I guess this is progress, but I foresee a lot of "what version of plfoo did
you try to install against your database" posts coming into the lists.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 20:07:53 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 19:21:04 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-05-05 20:02:10 | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-05 19:56:46 | Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover? |