From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-05 16:16:52 |
Message-ID: | 20050505131459.B42300@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS
> server? If so, that would work.
I believe that I can made a 'meta module' that, if I checked it out, would
include all sub-modules, and that I can tag/branch appropriately ... if
not, its just a matter of looping through each at the same time, a little
more work, but not much more ...
> If, as it currently appears, we'll end up moving in all of plphp,
> pljava, plr, then we might as well be consistent and offer all
> procedural languages, with the possible exception of plpgsql,
> exclusively as a separate tarball, to be released exactly when a server
> release is done.
I believe that that is what Tom is proposing, and that I'm
enthusiastically endorsing ..
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 16:17:55 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-05-05 15:59:20 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 16:17:55 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 16:11:13 | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |