From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
Date: | 2005-05-05 19:37:55 |
Message-ID: | 200505051237.55240.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
> I can think of a couple of ways offhand about how the information schema
> could be extended without breaking the SQL standard. You could just
> add columns where needed. Or you could add tables that are joined to
> the standard tables and contain the extra information. Or you could
> create a "information_schema_2" that contains a copy of the original
> information schema with the extra information added somewhere, so users
> can easily switch back and forth.
>
> If you look closer, there isn't really all that much that cannot be
> gotten from the information schema. Figuring out exactly what that is
> might be instructive before deciding how to go forward.
This makes sense; I do wish that someone had mentioned it when I originally
raised the subject of new system views. It would have saved us some work.
--Josh
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-05-05 19:41:05 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 19:21:04 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |