Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

Dave Held wrote:
> > developers and users of PostgreSQL. Everyone is welcome to
> > subscribe and take part in the discussions. (See the
> > <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html">
> > Developer's FAQ</A> for information on how to get
> > involved in PostgreSQL development.)</P>
> >
> > Adjustments?
>
> "...are more for administrative purposes [then->than] control..."

Fixed.

Would you please review the existing developer's FAQ and let me know
what needs to be added in relation to your ideas below?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

> <p>Because PostgreSQL is a monolithic product, all of its features
> must work together in tight harmony. It is in the interests of
> the PostgreSQL community that new features be integrated in a way
> that preserves this harmony. Thus, new feature proposals are
> scrutinized and debated by the community to ensure that changes
> have sufficient technical merit. Be prepared to defend your
> proposal, and don't assume that a privately developed contribution
> will automatically be accepted by the PostgreSQL community. To
> maximize the chance of success in proposing a change, consider
> these suggestions:
>
> * Propose your change/feature publicly - OSS is about community,
> and a collection of contributors working independently without
> communication is not a community; this avoids duplication of
> effort and promotes collaboration/cooperation among parties
> that have a common interest
> * Research your proposal to see if it has already been discussed
> on the mailing list
> * Research your proposed solution to make sure it is the best of
> breed - database technology is a very active subject of
> academic research, and it is possible, if not likely, that
> someone has written a paper on the topic
> * Engage the community by participating in discussions and patch
> reviews - your credibility as a contributor depends on your
> willingness to contribute to the community in non-coding
> ways as well
> </p>
>
> I realize that this runs a bit far afield from the original
> question of "Who controls PostgreSQL?", but I think it addresses
> the points that someone who asks this question is likely to
> want to know. It also tackles the contribution question from
> a higher level than the dev-faq. Obviously, the bullet points
> would be formatted as a list or some other appropriate HTML
> construct. And as a minor point, it would be nice if the
> website validated to XHTML-strict, although XHTML-transitional
> would be a good compromise.
>
> __
> David B. Held
> Software Engineer/Array Services Group
> 200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
> 320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073