Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 04:19:41
Message-ID: 200505032119.41994.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave,

> My main concern was pushing out existing code, not adding code that was
> not in the tarball.
> I would have to agree deciding which to include would be onerous.

I personally am not proposing pushing stuff out, except some of the legacy
(i.e. not maintained) contrib modules.

I do find it kind of funny that we include the PLs but not the server-side
drivers, but that decision precedes my tenure on Core.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-04 04:27:01 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-05-04 04:14:23 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement