| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? |
| Date: | 2005-05-03 18:51:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20050503185131.GE12359@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:48:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> >> Isn't this bogus?
>
> > No. Note the comment immediately above, as well as the header comment
> > for the function.
>
> OTOH, now that I think about it there's no reason whatever for that
> bizarre call convention. Let's split the function into two: one to
> expand an existing multixact, and one to make a multixact from two
> regular xids.
No problem ... shall I write a patch, or did you do it already?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-03 18:51:44 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-05-03 18:51:13 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |