Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 16:40:17
Message-ID: 200505031840.18267.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Not really that ugly. It is just an extra compile step. Besides
> you don't have to package it just because it is in the Tarball.

Since you keep raising that point: Not packaging something is not a
valid solution to something being hard to package.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-05-03 17:02:04 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Dave Held 2005-05-03 16:34:05 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-05-03 16:45:35 Re: distributed database
Previous Message Dave Held 2005-05-03 16:34:05 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement