| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-03 10:46:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200505031246.19426.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Am Montag, 2. Mai 2005 20:14 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK
> with it. It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal
> with the recursive dependency problem.
How will a "separate compile stage" work for actually building, say, RPM or
Debian packages? The only way I can see is wrapping up the PostgreSQL
distribution tarball a second time as a "plphp" source package and build from
there, which seems quite weird.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-05-03 13:38:19 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-05-03 06:23:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-05-03 10:55:15 | Re: BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-05-03 10:12:33 | Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only |