From: | lucas(at)presserv(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Function or Field? |
Date: | 2005-05-03 11:58:24 |
Message-ID: | 20050503085824.kx88ad92vqhwwww0@www.presserv.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Do I have to create another table to put this data???
But, Isn't it redundancy? :-/
The question is: For example:
I have a "clients" table and I have a "taxes" table that is a chield
of client.
Is more efficient put fields into client table that contains:
-) the count for paid taxes
-) the count for unpaid taxes
-) the count for all taxes
-) the last tax expiration date
Or is more efficient construct a function that will count this field runtime,
as a view for example, or a simple function.
-) SELECT count(*) from taxes where client=$1 and not nullvalue(dt_pay);
-) SELECT count(*) from taxes where client=$1 and nullvalue(dt_pay);
-) SELECT count(*) from taxes where client=$1;
-) SELECT dt_expiration from taxes where client=$1 order by
dt_expiration desc
limit 1;
While having few records in "taxes" table, the function (runtime) work
right and
in good time, but when the "taxes" table grows I think the function
will run so
slow...
What is correct???
Construct a Function to count runtime? or Create a Trigger to update the
"clients" fields before all action and use those fields in select???
Thanks
Quoting Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>:
> You could also make a table with just that data in it so you don't have the
> field in all the records and you don't have to check all the records to see
> what is next.
>
> I am assuming this is some kind of a flag values used in a batch, if you
> just need the last id I use max(id)+1.
>
> Joel Fradkin
>
> Wazagua, Inc.
> 2520 Trailmate Dr
> Sarasota, Florida 34243
> Tel. 941-753-7111 ext 305
>
> jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com
> www.wazagua.com
> Powered by Wazagua
> Providing you with the latest Web-based technology & advanced tools.
> C 2004. WAZAGUA, Inc. All rights reserved. WAZAGUA, Inc
> This email message is for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
> use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete and destroy
> all copies of the original message, including attachments.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> On Behalf Of lucas(at)presserv(dot)org
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:17 PM
> To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [SQL] Function or Field?
>
> Hi.
> What is the better way to store the last record for a translation???
> I.E:
> The data for the last product vendding.
> What is better:
> a) Create a field in "product" table and create a Trigger (before insert or
> update into vendding table) to alter this field.
> b) Create a view or function that check the all venddings (in vendding
> table)
> for the specified product and return the last vendding information?
>
> a)
> CREATE TABLE products(
> id serial primary key,
> description varchar(50),
> last_vendding date() --Is correct to use this field???
> );
> CREATE TABLE vendding(
> id serial primary key,
> date_ date,
> product integer references (products)
> );
> CREATE TRIGGER TG_change_products_last_vendding_field on table vendding
> BEFORE
> INSERT OR UPDATE FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE procedure
> change_products_last_vendding();
>
> b)
> CREATE TABLE products (
> id serial primary key,
> description varchar(50)
> );
> CREATE TABLE vendding(
> id serial primary key,
> date_ date,
> product integer references (products)
> );
> CREATE VIEW last_product_change as SELECT * from vendding order by date_
> desc
> limit 1; --Okay, this view will return the last record and not the last
> record
> for a product... but its a example.
>
> I am asking it becouse I have used CLIPPER(dbase) for my old programs and in
> DBASE the view/check function that will check for each select is not
> functional. And I need to create a field in all table references, but in
> DBASE
> this fields allways broken and I need to recheck it.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | lucas | 2005-05-03 12:14:52 | Re: Record Log Trigger |
Previous Message | Ramakrishnan Muralidharan | 2005-05-03 11:49:00 | Re: Function or Field? |