Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Held <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Date: 2005-05-02 19:57:36
Message-ID: 200505021957.j42Jvaj08345@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
> > to get through.
>
> I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
> your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
> ;-).

I replied to your concerns on Saturday night, and when I saw no
community response by noon today, I assume everyone as OK and applied
it. I suppose this is as good an illustration of the process as we are
going to get.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 20:00:17 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-02 19:51:02 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 20:00:17 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Andrew - Supernews 2005-05-02 19:53:56 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1