From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-02 08:11:40 |
Message-ID: | 200505021011.42278.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> The specific scenario this feature is intended to resolve is
> idle-in-transaction backends holding on to resources while the
> network connection times out;
I was under the impression that the specific scenario is
busy-in-transaction backends continuing to produce and send data while
the client has disappeared. Why does the backend ignore network errors
and keep sending data?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brent Verner | 2005-05-02 08:15:36 | Re: custom guc vars |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 06:56:08 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 08:49:07 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 06:56:08 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |