From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-04-29 15:43:37 |
Message-ID: | 20050429124149.W53065@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:09:43 -0400,
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>>>> In the last exciting episode, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
>>>>> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)
>>>
>>>> If this can kick off a vacuum of a Very Large Table at an unfortunate
>>>> time, this can turn out to be a prety painful misfeature.
>>>
>>> [ shrug... ] You'll always be able to turn it off if you don't want it.
>>> I'm not sure that we'll be ready to turn it on by default even in 8.1.
>>
>> Agreed. It will just be there to turn on from postgresql.conf if you
>> want it, and we do have TODO information about keeping such an FSM for
>> recently expired pages.
>
> I think if we aren't finding problems in testing that it would be better
> to turn pg_autovacuum on by default. Vacuum is something the burns new
> users and having it one by default is going to cut down on surprises.
Except for the surprise of peridically having the system go unresponsive
because it hit a large table, and that new user wondering what is wrong
with postgresql that it just stalls seemingly randomly :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-29 15:50:54 | Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-04-29 15:40:13 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-04-29 15:51:40 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-04-29 15:40:13 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |