| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD |
| Date: | 2005-04-29 05:57:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20050429055702.GA69124@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:47:45PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >
> >What version of PostgreSQL are you using
>
> The latest and greatest from CVS.
Which branch? HEAD? REL8_0_STABLE?
> Wouldn't it make sense to be able to define a record in the projection
> part of a query, similar to what I was attempting with my SELECT? Has
> this been discussed or is it just considered as not very useful?
Sounds reasonable to me, but if it's currently possible then I
haven't yet figured out how to do it. I can't remember if it's
been discussed before or not. If nobody answers here then you
might try pgsql-hackers.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-04-29 06:26:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD |
| Previous Message | Wenzhe Zhou (wzhou) | 2005-04-29 05:01:26 | Re: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-04-29 06:26:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-29 05:22:51 | Re: Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres |