Re: Official ODBC announcement

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Official ODBC announcement
Date: 2005-04-28 06:08:36
Message-ID: 200504280608.j3S68aB19082@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >>I don't want to do that. I would rather just have the perpetual license
> >>and allow the developer to do what they wish.
> >
> >
> > How do you do that when the submitting license doesn't match the user
> > license?
>
> You have to require that the license that the contribution is being
> delivered under is relicenseable, sublicenseable, perpetual and irrevocable.
>
> In that way it is very much like the the current PostgreSQL contributions.

Yes, and of course it is very different, because that license isn't the
same as the one he has with the existing software.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-28 06:12:46 Re: Official ODBC announcement
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-28 06:05:25 Re: Official ODBC announcement