From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | deepak <deepak(at)jtech(dot)co(dot)in> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1633: about transactions and row level locking |
Date: | 2005-04-28 01:32:28 |
Message-ID: | 20050428013228.GA19750@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 13:56:02 +0100,
deepak <deepak(at)jtech(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
This isn't a bug, its a question. I am moving the discussion over to
the general list.
> Bug reference: 1633
> Logged by: deepak
> Email address: deepak(at)jtech(dot)co(dot)in
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
> Operating system: MS windows 2000 Server
> Description: about transactions and row level locking
> Details:
>
> How we can know a record is locked before updating the record. The purpose
> is to avoid deadlock or queuing of update statements while using "select *
> from table for update".
You might be able to use a short timeout on the statement that tries the
update.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fredrik Olsson | 2005-04-28 15:31:45 | BUG #1636: Foreign key referencing inherited table fails. |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-04-27 23:35:30 | Re: BUG #1628: JDBC bug with regard to text column data type |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-04-28 01:44:36 | Re: Reduce size of $PGDATA for "demo cdrom"? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-28 01:22:42 | Re: I must be daft, but I can't figure out what is wrong with this |