| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |
| Date: | 2005-04-28 01:22:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200504280122.j3S1MWr06823@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > There is a fairly lengthy discussion going on right now on the bizgres
> > mailing list about this topic, if your interested in helping out you
> > might want to join that list.
>
> What's the point of keeping such backend development discussion separate
> from the -hackers list? It's always been a mistake in the past...
That was my impression too.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-28 01:43:09 | Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-28 01:16:47 | Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |