From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
Date: | 2005-04-24 22:54:29 |
Message-ID: | 200504242254.j3OMsTo03707@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. asynchronous? Or
> > does master-master imply synchronous?
>
> It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication without it
> being master<->master.
We could mention async vs sync but at the FAQ stage I think the
multi-master/master-slave disinction is enough. Let's see what questions
we get.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-04-24 23:15:06 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
Previous Message | User Andrewsn | 2005-04-24 20:04:32 | newsysviews - newsysview: build cleanup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-04-24 23:15:06 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-24 18:40:50 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item. |