| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Software Patents |
| Date: | 2005-04-22 15:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20050422155955.GC21847@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Maybe a good starting point would be for the core to agree on an official
statement about why ARC was replaced with 2Q and publish that statement
somewhere on the web page.
I think real cases of problems caused by patents will do more good than a
bunch of people saying they don't like them.
Someone could then let someone like FFII know about the statement and its URL
and that should get it where people will hear about it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-04-22 16:01:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | filip wuytack | 2005-04-22 15:37:12 | MySQL & Red Hat? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-04-22 16:01:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-22 15:33:27 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |