From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Held <dave(dot)held(at)arrayservicesgrp(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! |
Date: | 2005-04-22 15:17:14 |
Message-ID: | 20050422121617.S1315@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Dave Held wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:46 AM
>> To: Dave Held
>> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
>> headaches!! :)
>>
>> [...]
>> With GCC 4.x, there are new optimizations, and a while new set
>> of "unknowns" that we're going to possibly get bug reports for
>> ... and, it *is* a .0 major release for GCC,
>
> Yeah, I agree that the first version of a major release can be a
> bit hairy.
>
>> so there are bound to be bugs in their optimizer also,
>
> Well that's like saying there were bound to be bugs in postgres
> 8.0 ;>
There were, else we wouldn't have released 8.0.1 :)
> So just make the build system detect the version number and compile with
> -O0 or -O1 for gcc >= 4.0. ;> Anyway, that's what I thought the
> regression tests are for. Or is the development team unlikely to do any
> builds against 4.x for a while?
See Tom's posting ... they (redhat) have apparently been playing with 4.x
for awhile now, and all looks good ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-04-22 15:17:38 | possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. |
Previous Message | Dave Held | 2005-04-22 15:10:15 | Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) |