Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 03:06:32
Message-ID: 200504212006.32836.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Bruce,

> > Well, I think everyone knows where I stand on this ....
>
> Uh, I forgot.

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=2005041120232361&title=How%20IBM%27s%20patent%20application%20disrupted%20PostgreSQL&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=299028#c299082
http://www.osdir.com/Article5033.phtml

For. We should have one.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Astor 2005-04-22 03:09:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-22 03:03:02 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Astor 2005-04-22 03:09:13 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-22 03:03:02 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents