| From: | Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps |
| Date: | 2005-04-21 15:01:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200504211701.24736.oliver@siegmar.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
On Thursday 21 April 2005 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think it's a new bug, seeing that I didn't change the code
> for the ISO case.
>
> I see the imprecise result only in the non-integer-datetime case; is
> it acting differently for you?
You're right - it has nothing to do with your patch. I thought that because I
had the problem on one system (with your patch) but not on another (without
your patch). But these systems are having another difference - 64bit integer
datetimes.
I have this imprecise only on the non-integer-datetime server, too.
> If it is only the float case, some imprecision is to be expected.
So everything is okay?
Oliver
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-21 15:10:08 | Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps |
| Previous Message | hyperspacez | 2005-04-21 15:01:20 | BUG #1613: Installation flaw |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-21 15:10:08 | Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-21 13:57:40 | Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps |