| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Held <dave(dot)held(at)arrayservicesgrp(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
| Date: | 2005-04-20 00:05:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20050420000528.GS58835@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Dave Held wrote:
> Hmm...so you're saying that at some point, quantity beats quality?
> That's an interesting point. However, it presumes that you can
> actually distribute your data over a larger number of drives. If
> you have a db with a bottleneck of one or two very large tables,
> the extra spindles won't help unless you break up the tables and
> glue them together with query magic. But it's still a point to
> consider.
Huh? Do you know how RAID10 works?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-20 00:12:24 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-20 00:03:39 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |