From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | newz(at)bearfruit(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Date: | 2005-04-19 23:08:36 |
Message-ID: | 20050419230836.GQ58835@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:51:46AM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> So if you all were going to choose between two hard drives where:
> drive A has capacity C and spins at 15K rpms, and
> drive B has capacity 2 x C and spins at 10K rpms and
> all other features are the same, the price is the same and C is enough
> disk space which would you choose?
>
> I've noticed that on IDE drives, as the capacity increases the data
> density increases and there is a pereceived (I've not measured it)
> performance increase.
>
> Would the increased data density of the higher capacity drive be of
> greater benefit than the faster spindle speed of drive A?
The increased data density will help transfer speed off the platter, but
that's it. It won't help rotational latency.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-20 00:03:39 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2005-04-19 22:13:43 | Re: [HACKERS] PLM pulling from CVS nightly for testing in STP |