From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Don Isgitt <djisgitt(at)soundenergy(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgresql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: substring and POSIX re's |
Date: | 2005-04-19 16:39:52 |
Message-ID: | 20050419163952.GA15350@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:03:45AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:17:46AM -0500, Don Isgitt wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Tom. Interestingly enough, neither my original query or your
> > corrected one returns anything with pg 7.4--another good reason to
> > upgrade to 8.*
>
> Hmmm...for me both queries give the results shown if I run them in
> 7.3.9, 7.4.7, 8.0.2, or 8.1devel. What's different about your 7.4
> installation?
Maybe the regex_flavor setting? (not sure of the exact name)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-04-19 17:10:16 | Re: substring and POSIX re's |
Previous Message | Daniel Schuchardt | 2005-04-19 16:26:44 | Re: What means Postgres? |