Re: substring and POSIX re's

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Don Isgitt <djisgitt(at)soundenergy(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgresql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: substring and POSIX re's
Date: 2005-04-19 16:39:52
Message-ID: 20050419163952.GA15350@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:03:45AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:17:46AM -0500, Don Isgitt wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Tom. Interestingly enough, neither my original query or your
> > corrected one returns anything with pg 7.4--another good reason to
> > upgrade to 8.*
>
> Hmmm...for me both queries give the results shown if I run them in
> 7.3.9, 7.4.7, 8.0.2, or 8.1devel. What's different about your 7.4
> installation?

Maybe the regex_flavor setting? (not sure of the exact name)

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-19 17:10:16 Re: substring and POSIX re's
Previous Message Daniel Schuchardt 2005-04-19 16:26:44 Re: What means Postgres?