From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables |
Date: | 2005-04-19 14:35:49 |
Message-ID: | 200504191435.j3JEZnL04114@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Guys, is this patch ready for application? I think so, but am not 100%
> > sure.
>
> I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
> Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality. We need to
> settle on better names.
OK, are the values returned not the same as the Oracle values? If they
aren't, you are right, we need another name.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-19 14:37:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-19 14:34:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-19 14:37:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-19 14:34:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables |