| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with web TODO list |
| Date: | 2005-04-18 04:51:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200504172151.28343.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Bruce,
> The issue is what do you want to track, and how much time is it worth
> expending to track it. Personally, I am just fine with the current
> system. I don't have enough time to do the important things, let alone
> time to track who requested certain features and why, and I don't think
> it is useful for me to change that. If others want to expend the time,
> I will support them in hopes that they will expend the time to track it
> and I will not have to be as involved.
Agreed, bugzilla isn't going to help. Frankly, I haven't see the software
that *would* help. I don't think it's been written yet. What we need is
software that:
1) let us track various TODOs
2) kept draft specifications for those TODOs
3) kept partial code when contributed
4) linked to e-mail discussions
5) tracked who'd volunteered to implement and/or test features
6) tracked which features were dependant on which other features being
implemented.
7) was searchable
That, IMHO, would make it worth a little extra effort to enter stuff. And you
could draft help.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-04-18 07:45:34 | Re: Problem with web TODO list |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-18 04:16:06 | Re: Problem with web TODO list |