| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: argtype_inherit() is dead code |
| Date: | 2005-04-16 20:59:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20050416205908.GA12073@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:39:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Digging in the CVS history, it appears that I may have broken it here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/parser/parse_coerce.c.diff?r1=2.35;r2=2.36;f=h
> It's quite possible that it failed even before that however; I don't
> have a pre-7.0 server handy to check it on. In any case, given the lack
> of complaints since 7.0, it doesn't seem anyone is trying to do this
> kind of thing.
Given the limitations of table inheritance, it doesn't surprise me that
nobody really uses it to implement object-oriented programs.
Is it really an important area to improve, or are there other priorities?
I know some people wished we had better support for inheritance, but how
strong is that wish?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Para tener más hay que desear menos"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-16 21:13:14 | Re: argtype_inherit() is dead code |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-16 20:18:49 | Re: Hash vs. HashJoin nodes |