Re: Nested Sets

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Sets
Date: 2005-04-16 18:14:57
Message-ID: 20050416181457.GA14377@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 06:28:27PM +0400, A. Kulikov wrote:
> btw, do stored procedures (user functions in other words) have to
> implement table locking or be carried out inside a transaction such
> that the nested set indexes remain intact?

They're always in a transaction. Everything in Postgres is always
inside a transaction (although it might be a transaction of a single
statement). You shouldn't need to do anything special around table
locking.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Troels Arvin 2005-04-16 20:02:24 Re: Nested Sets
Previous Message A. Kulikov 2005-04-16 14:28:27 Re: Nested Sets