From: | Enrico Weigelt <weigelt(at)metux(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: clear function cache (WAS: SQL function inlining) |
Date: | 2005-04-15 20:40:55 |
Message-ID: | 20050415204055.GA20345@nibiru.borg.metux.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
* Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > * Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:32:48PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > >
> > > > BTW: is it possible to explicitly clear the cache for immutable
> > > > functions ?
> > >
> > > What cache? There is no caching of function results.
> >
> > Not ? So what's immutable for ?
>
> For knowing that you can do things like use it in a functional index and
> I think for things like constant folding in a prepared plan.
So when can I expect the function to be reevaluated ?
Next query ? Next session ? Random time ?
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact(at)metux(dot)de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Nuzum | 2005-04-15 20:43:47 | Re: Spend 7K *WHERE*? WAS Intel SRCS16 SATA raid? and How |
Previous Message | Mohan, Ross | 2005-04-15 18:26:57 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |