From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Praise (was: [ADMIN] is postgresql 8 is realy mature) |
Date: | 2005-04-15 20:11:58 |
Message-ID: | 20050415201158.GD11590@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:22:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> So far I've been very pleased with the low defect rate against 8.0.
> Most of the bugs we have fixed were either in new features, or were
> pre-existing problems that also occur in 7.4 or even further back.
As usual, I've been remiss lately in keeping up with my mail, but I
thought this was a good note to lean on. I fully expected a series
of rather nasty surprises with the 8.0 release, given the piles of
new code plus the Windows port. I think it is a real testament to
the quality of Postgres hackers, and the code you produce, that there
have been so few problems with 8.0. If every dot-zero release of
every product were this good, people wouldn't be so gun-shy about
upgrades.
You folks should be extremely proud of yourselves. Good work.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Westmacott | 2005-04-15 20:55:32 | database corruption |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-15 16:58:02 | Re: cost of empty fields |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-04-15 21:01:11 | Re: Help - Urgent |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-04-15 18:38:39 | Re: Kerberos patch in the queue |